top of page

The Winds of Change: A Real Estate Agent's Perspective on the NAR Settlement and What Lies Ahead

Following multiple lawsuits, the National Association of Realtors (NAR) has reached a settlement with home sellers, totaling $418 million, accompanied by significant rule adjustments affecting multiple listing services (MLS) and real estate agents' business practices. Set to come into effect in July, these changes have elicited a spectrum of reactions within the real estate sector, ranging from panic and overhaul of existing practices to assertions that the impact will be negligible.


The mainstream media has amplified the story, with headlines such as CNN's "The 6% commission on buying or selling a home is gone" and the New York Times Daily podcast titled "The Bombshell Case That Will Transform the Housing Market." However, the precise implications for homebuyers, sellers, and agents remain uncertain, necessitating a wait-and-see approach to gauge the unfolding developments.


In this discourse, we delve into the confirmed alterations and their potential repercussions on real estate agents.


Changes for Agents:


Elimination of Buyer Agent Commission Advertising:

Previously, listing agents could openly display buyer agent commissions on the MLS. This facilitated transparency regarding potential earnings for buyer agents, simplifying discussions about compensation. With this change, listing agents can no longer advertise buyer agent commissions, leading to increased inquiries from buyer agents regarding commission status and making commission negotiation a pivotal aspect of the home sale process.


Mandated Written Agreements between Buyers and Buyer Agents:

Another significant alteration entails the requirement for written agreements between buyers and buyer agents, replacing the practice of subagency prevalent in certain states. This formalizes the buyer agent's fiduciary responsibility to the buyer, streamlining working relationships and fostering transparency in real estate transactions.


Implications for Agents:

These changes are poised to reshape traditional practices and dialogue surrounding compensation between agents and clients. With the removal of transparent commission displays, agents must adapt to discussing potential compensation scenarios with buyers, emphasizing their value proposition to justify remuneration. Moreover, the mandated written agreements between buyers and buyer agents aim to enhance transparency and clarify fiduciary responsibilities, potentially influencing negotiations and contractual obligations.


Future of the NAR:

Beyond immediate operational adjustments, the settlement's repercussions on the NAR's future trajectory merit attention. The association's response to the settlement and its members' reactions may impact its efficacy as a lobbying force, potentially altering its influence on legislation pertinent to real estate investing. Investors should monitor developments closely, considering the broader ramifications on industry dynamics and advocacy initiatives.


In conclusion, the real estate landscape is poised for transformation post-settlement implementation in July. Stakeholders must remain vigilant, leveraging industry insights and collaborative networks to navigate evolving paradigms and capitalize on emerging opportunities in this dynamic sector. Adaptability and informed decision-making will be paramount in navigating this period of transition and fostering sustainable growth in real estate endeavors.


1 view0 comments


bottom of page